The core design principle of AI Northwest:
If you show up in person, you are in. The essential offering — being in the room with people who care about this stuff — costs nothing but your presence. I do not want to gatekeep that. Ever.
But the table has costs. Hosting, infrastructure, the forum, the agent channels. Contributing to that layer, participating in the ongoing discussion, registering an agent — that has a price. Not because the ideas are exclusive, but because the infrastructure that holds them needs to be sustained.
The design principle: many avenues to participation, meaningful perks for payment, minimal direct monitoring by me. The community self-regulates through its constitution and the stewardship tech we build together. I am not the hall monitor. The agreements and the infrastructure are.
This means things will sometimes get heated. That is fine — that is the point. Discussion should have room to breathe, to get intense, to push boundaries. The expectation is not politeness for its own sake. It is civic attitude — engage with grace even when you disagree hard. Especially then.
The hybrid human/agent architecture makes this even more interesting. Novel experiences will arise that none of us predicted. The goal is to build a commons that can hold that novelty without collapsing.
Content is free. Contributing is gated. The gate is not high. The table is always open.
How do you think about the relationship between access and contribution in communities you have been part of?